Page 65 - GALENIKA MEDICAL JOURNAL
P. 65

pratiti bolesnike duži vremenski period i obuhvatiti veći broj ispitanika, kako bi se definisali korelati
            i adekvatni terapijski modaliteti. Svakako je preporuka da se u narednim ispitivanjima bolesnici sa
            istim tipom bola, podele u jasno definisane grupe, kako bi se adekvatno procenio terapijski uspeh
            određenog preparata u kupiranju bola. Za lekare kliničare je najvažnije da bi trebalo misliti o bolu kao
            simptomu kod bolesnika sa GBS koji bi trebalo adekvatno tretirati, kako bi se poboljšao kvalitet života
            obolelih. Zato je preporučljivo koristiti specifične upitnike za prepoznavanje kvaliteta i kvantiteta bola
            u svakodnevnoj kliničkoj praksi, kako pri dijagnostikovanju, tako i prilikom dugotrajnog praćenja
            bolesnika sa GBS.





            Abstract

            Immune-mediated neuropathies, including Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS), represent a heterogeneous group of disorders
            caused by a loss of immune tolerance to antigens of peripheral nerves or surrounding blood vessels. Clinically, GBS is
            characterized by the development of symmetrical muscle weakness over up to four weeks, accompanied by sensory
            disturbances and dysautonomia. Pain is a common symptom of GBS, but unfortunately, it is often overlooked. Pain should
            be viewed multidimensionally, and the biopsychosocial model is currently widely accepted. Pain assessment is conducted
            using various unidimensional, multidimensional, and specialized scales to detect the neuropathic component of pain.
            Regarding pain as the first symptom of the disease, previous studies have shown that this is the case in about 70% of
            patients. Pain in GBS patients has both neuropathic and nociceptive components. A previous study conducted on GBS
            patients in our population found that the prevalence of pain in the acute phase was 85.5%, and neuropathic pain was
            present in 26.4% of cases. Rare studies have shown that after the acute phase of the disease, pain decreases, but sensitive
            neuropathic elements such as paresthesias/dysesthesias often remain. It is also assumed that pain plays a significant
            role in worsening depression and anxiety, as well as negatively impacting the quality of life and sleep in GBS patients.
            Pain management in GBS involves both specific (Intravenous Immunoglobulin Therapy, IVIG, and/or Therapeutic Plasma
            Exchanges, TPE) and nonspecific treatment methods (supportive therapy), as well as the use of analgesics and co-analgesics
            based on the principles of treating pain syndromes, depending on the assumed pathophysiological mechanism. After the
            acute phase of the disease, special attention is given to physical rehabilitation treatment and psychosocial support for the
            patient. Therefore, the involvement of other specialists (physiatrist, psychiatrist, clinical psychologist, and pain medicine
            specialist) is of crucial importance for adequate pain management.

            Keywords: neuropathy, Guillian-Barre syndrome, pain, quality of life





            Literatura                                          8.  Tham SL, Prasad K, Umapathi T. Guillain-Barré syndrome mimics. Brain
                                                                  Behav. 2018 Apr 10;8(5):e00960.
                                                                9.  Verboon C, van Doorn PA, Jacobs BC. Treatment dilemmas in Guillain-
            1.  Kieseier BC, Mathey EK, Sommer C, Hartung HP. Immune-mediated   Barré syndrome. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2017 Apr;88(4):346-52.
               neuropathies. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2018 Oct 11;4(1):31.
                                                                10.  Liu S, Dong C, Ubogu EE. Immunotherapy of Guillain-Barré syndrome.
            2.  Stojanov A, Berisavac I, Bozovic I, Arsenijevic M, Lukic-Rajic S, Petrovic   Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2018;14(11):2568-79.
               M, et al. Incidence and mortality rates of Guillain-Barré syndrome in
               Serbia. J Peripher Nerv Syst. 2020 Dec;25(4):350-5.  11.  Van Koningsveld R, Schmitz PI, Meché FG, Visser LH, Meulstee J, van
                                                                  Doorn PA. Dutch GBS study group. Effect of methylprednisolone
            3.  Shahrizaila N, Lehmann HC, Kuwabara S. Guillain-Barré syndrome.   when added to standard treatment with intravenous immunoglobulin
               Lancet. 2021 Mar 27;397(10280):1214-28.            for Guillain-Barré syndrome: randomised trial. Lancet. 2004 Jan
            4.  Van den Berg B, Walgaard C, Drenthen J, Fokke C, Jacobs BC, van Doorn   17;363(9404):192-6.
               PA. Guillain-Barré syndrome: pathogenesis, diagnosis, treatment and   12.  Walgaard C, Lingsma HF, Ruts L, van Doorn PA, Steyerberg EW, Jacobs
               prognosis. Nat Rev Neurol. 2014 Aug;10(8):469-82.   BC. Early recognition of poor prognosis in Guillain-Barre syndrome.
            5.  Dimachkie MM, Barohn RJ. Guillain-Barré syndrome and variants.   Neurology. 2011 Mar 15;76(11):968-75.
               Neurol Clin. 2013 May;31(2):491-510.             13.  Wen P, Wang L, Liu H, Gong L, Ji H, Wu H, et al. Risk factors for the
            6.  Shang P, Zhu M, Wang Y, Zheng X, Wu X, Zhu J, et al. Axonal variants of   severity of Guillain-Barré syndrome and predictors of short-term
               Guillain-Barré syndrome: an update. J Neurol. 2021 Jul;268(7):2402-19.  prognosis of severe Guillain-Barré syndrome. Sci Rep. 2021 Jun
                                                                  2;11(1):11578.
            7.  Van Doorn PA. Diagnosis, treatment and prognosis of Guillain-Barré
               syndrome (GBS). Presse Med. 2013 Jun;42(6 Pt 2):e193-201.  14.  Bendinger T, Plunkett N. Measurement in pain medicine. BJA Education.
                                                                  2016;16(9):310-5.


            REVIJALNI RADOVI                                                 Galenika Medical Journal, 2024; 3(11):59-64.  63
   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70